Gilles Moec Macrocast: Holding One’s Breath
- 04 November 2024 (10 min read)
Poll aggregators suggest that the US presidential race is very tight, but the change in dynamics – Harris’ national lead has been shrinking slowly since mid-October, and Trump is now seen in the lead in 5 out of 7 swing states, albeit with tiny margins – combined with the memory of the polls’ understatement of voting intentions for the Republican candidate in 2016 and 2020 has pushed the market into pricing quite clearly a Trump victory. Collectively, investors seem to agree with the notion that a Trump 2.0 administration would come with more inflation and a higher deficit – we concur. This results in a rise in US long-term yields and an upward revision in the market’s expected trajectory for the Fed even in the absence of new significant macro data.
We explore once again the main macro policy issues at stake here (regulation, immigration, trade, fiscal policy, and the possible erosion of the Fed’s independence), with the help of a remarkable, quantified paper by the Peterson Institute which tackles three out these five issues. The paper largely confirms our view that, taken in isolation, a 10% hike in US tariffs would be manageable by the rest of the world, especially if monetary policy is allowed to play its stabilisation role, adopting a more hawkish stance in the US and a more dovish one elsewhere. However, we disagree with the mostly benign assessment of the impact of a 60% tariff hike on imports from China on third countries. We do not think that in such configuration we could count on a relative stability of the yuan. The temptation of depreciating the currency aggressively would become very difficult to resist in Beijing, with significant knock-on effects on Europe. We also highlight the importance of the contagion effects from a dominant US bond market in case of additional fiscal drift. This calls for even more readiness to act, if need be, by the ECB.
While the US elections leaves of course little bandwidth, we also explore the UK budget unveiled last week. The market reaction was measured, but we feel a chance to build a mutually beneficial trade-off between fiscal and monetary policy has been missed there.
Disclaimer
This document is for informational purposes only and does not constitute investment research or financial analysis relating to transactions in financial instruments as per MIF Directive (2014/65/EU), nor does it constitute on the part of AXA Investment Managers or its affiliated companies an offer to buy or sell any investments, products or services, and should not be considered as solicitation or investment, legal or tax advice, a recommendation for an investment strategy or a personalized recommendation to buy or sell securities.
It has been established on the basis of data, projections, forecasts, anticipations and hypothesis which are subjective. Its analysis and conclusions are the expression of an opinion, based on available data at a specific date.
All information in this document is established on data made public by official providers of economic and market statistics. AXA Investment Managers disclaims any and all liability relating to a decision based on or for reliance on this document. All exhibits included in this document, unless stated otherwise, are as of the publication date of this document.
Furthermore, due to the subjective nature of these opinions and analysis, these data, projections, forecasts, anticipations, hypothesis, etc. are not necessary used or followed by AXA IM’s portfolio management teams or its affiliates, who may act based on their own opinions. Any reproduction of this information, in whole or in part is, unless otherwise authorised by AXA IM, prohibited.
Neither MSCI nor any other party involved in or related to compiling, computing or creating the MSCI data makes any express or implied warranties or representations with respect to such data (or the results to be obtained by the use thereof), and all such parties hereby expressly disclaim all warranties of originality, accuracy, completeness, merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose with respect to any of such data. Without limiting any of the foregoing, in no event shall MSCI, any of its affiliates or any third party involved in or related to compiling, computing or creating the data have any liability for any direct, indirect, special, punitive, consequential or any other damages (including lost profits) even if notified of the possibility of such damages. No further distribution or dissemination of the MSCI data is permitted without MSCI’s express written consent.